Apple M3 Ultra benchmark reveals slight improvements compared to M4 Max.

Apple recently unveiled its new Mac Studio desktop, featuring the M3 Ultra and M4 Max chips, with the M3 Ultra now appearing in a Geekbench 6 listing. The M3 Ultra version includes a 32-core CPU and 256GB of unified memory, achieving a single-core score of 3,221 and a multi-core score of 27,749. Notably, the M3 Ultra is 20% slower in single-core performance than the M4 Max MacBook Pro but shows an 8% advantage in multi-core tests. Compared to the M2 Ultra, it offers 13% and 25% improvements in single and multi-core scores, respectively, falling short of Apple’s projected performance gains.

Earlier this week, Apple unveiled its latest Mac Studio desktop featuring the M4 Max and the all-new M3 Ultra chips. A model of the Mac Studio equipped with the M3 Ultra has surfaced in a Geekbench 6 listing, marking our first look at Apple’s premier M-series chip.

The listing reveals that the M3 Ultra Mac Studio (Mac15,14) encompasses the chip’s 32-core CPU and is equipped with 256GB of unified memory. It achieved a single-core score of 3,221 and a multi-core score of 27,749.


Mac Studio M3 Ultra Geekbench scorecard

Mac Studio M3 Ultra Geekbench scorecard

The results indicate that the M3 Ultra is approximately 20% slower in the single-core test than a MacBook Pro 16 featuring the M4 Max chip (16-core CPU). However, the multi-core results show an 8% lead for the M3 Ultra.

When comparing the M3 Ultra Mac Studio to its M2 Ultra predecessor, we observe a 13% improvement in single-core scores and a 25% increase in multi-core performance. This falls short of the advertised 50% CPU performance boost highlighted in Apple’s promotional materials.

It’s important to mention that these benchmarks are preliminary and focus on CPU performance, so further official tests and more GPU-intensive benchmarks are expected, where the M3 Ultra should demonstrate its capabilities. Additionally, the M3 Ultra utilizes TSMC’s first-generation 3nm process, while the M4 series benefits from the more efficient second-generation design.

Source

Leave a Comment